$1500 Free at Golden Tiger!
Free Contests
Back to WINNERonline
Sunday, September 7
MSG Boards Casinos Bingo Sports Contests Poker Games

Get Started

Beginner's Guide



Ask Max

Play a Casino

Top Picks



Directory



Reviews



Slide Show



Random Pick

News & Features

Articles

Player Resources

Best Bonuses



Best Payouts



Biggest Jackpots



Tournaments



Message Boards

Free Games

Play Now!

Rules & Strategies

Blackjack



Slots



more...

Free Contests

Win Prizes!

More Channels

Bingo



Sports



Poker


Newsletter


Get free gambling tips and info! Subscribe to Gambling Newsletter


Click Here!


Study's Value Questioned
Frank continues work with Berkley to topple Web restrictions
by Tony Batt, Stephens Washington Bureau
5 October, 2007

NEWS

SOURCE: Las Vegas Review-Journal

(Washington, D.C.) — Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., though he is a co-sponsor of Nevada-backed legislation to study Internet gambling, on Tuesday questioned its value.

"Studies don't do much," said Frank, who is chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

"What's to study? Whether or not I should be able to make my own bet with my own money?"

Frank made his comments in a brief interview after he addressed members of the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce at the Library of Congress. The chamber was meeting with lawmakers and federal officials in a series of briefings this week.

Frank told the Las Vegas group he is working with Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., on legislation to overturn an Internet gambling ban enacted by Congress last year.

Berkley and Jon Porter, R-Nev., introduced a bill in June calling for a one-year study of the $15 billion Internet gam- bling industry by the National Academy of Sciences.

So far, 64 members of the House, including Frank, have signed onto the Nevadans' bill as co-sponsors.

Frank introduced his own bill in April to repeal the ban and require the Department of Treasury to regulate online wagering sites.

Frank's bill has 37 co-sponsors including Berkley but not Porter.

Asked if he intends to move forward with his bill even though the study bill seems to have more support, Frank said, "Of course."

Online wagering companies in Europe, which are blocked from the U.S. market by the ban, are pressuring the European Union to seek as much as $100 billion in compensation from the American government.

"I know (the pressure) is going to increase. I don't know where it ends, but they're going to be asking big bucks from us," Frank said.

The European complaints follow a ruling by the World Trade Organization in March that the U.S. ban on Internet gambling violates international trade law.

A WTO judicial panel ruled in favor of the Caribbean island nation of Antigua and Barbuda, which challenged the U.S. ban on Internet gambling.

Mark Mendel, the attorney representing Antigua and Barbuda, has estimated the United States will have to pay up to $3.4 billion in damages.

Even if that amount is awarded to Antigua and Barbuda, Frank said it would not have a significant impact on the U.S. Internet gambling ban.

"(Antigua and Barbuda do not have) a big enough economy to have an impact on us," Frank said. "The European Union threatens us with much bigger negative consequences."

Email this page to a friend
Go to the Message Boards
Contact the editor


Click Here!

Click Here!

Click Here!


Click Here!





About Us - Search - Advertise - Webmasters - Feedback



Back to Top Copyright © 1999-2003 ALI Online Inc. All rights reserved. Service Terms | Editorial Policy